Course on Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th
300-hour online course in comparative studies of U, Pu and Th. 6 modules covering the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), IAEA INFCIRC/153 (comprehensive safeguards agreements) and Serpent. Assigned tutor and open enrolment.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Characterise uranium, plutonium and thorium as fertile and fissile materials.
Compare their neutronic behaviour in different spectra.
Analyse their properties as fuel materials.
Evaluate complete fuel cycles and the waste they generate.
Assess the economic and safeguards implications.
Carry out comparative cell calculations with neutronic codes.
Produce a reasoned comparative study.
Who it's for
- Reactor physics engineer who wants to specialise in Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th.
- Fuel cycle analyst who wants to specialise in Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th.
- Researcher in thorium cycles who wants to specialise in Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th.
- Safeguards specialist who wants to specialise in Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th.
- Nuclear strategy consultant who wants to specialise in Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th.
- Advanced reactor engineer who wants to specialise in Comparative Studies of U, Pu and Th.
- Graduates in engineering or science seeking to join nuclear research centres.
What you'll work with
- Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
- IAEA INFCIRC/153 (comprehensive safeguards agreements)
- IAEA SSR-2/1 (safety in the design of nuclear power plants)
- IAEA SSG-52 (reactor core design)
- Directive 2011/70/Euratom (spent fuel and waste management)
- IAEA SSR-4 (safety of fuel cycle facilities)
6 modules · 300 h
1.1Natural uranium and its isotopic composition1.2Uranium as a resource: reserves and market1.3Plutonium: origin in the reactor and composition by burnup1.4Natural thorium and its relative abundance1.5Concepts of fertile material and fissile material1.6Conversion of fertile into fissile material1.7Vocabulary of cycles and conversion ratios1.8International control framework for each material1.9Public data sources1.10Exercise: compare the composition of the three materials
2.1Cross sections of the main isotopes2.2Neutrons per fission and their spectrum2.3Behaviour in thermal and fast spectra2.4Capture and production of higher actinides2.5Reactivity and its evolution with burnup2.6Temperature and void coefficients2.7Delayed neutron fraction2.8Implications for reactor control2.9Advantages and limitations of each option2.10Practice: compare the reactivity of three fuels
3.1Chemical forms in use: oxides, carbides and metals3.2Comparison of thermal properties3.3Mechanical properties and behaviour under irradiation3.4Thorium dioxide and its stability3.5Mixed oxide fuel and its heterogeneity3.6Compatibility with cladding and coolants3.7Manufacturing difficulties of each option3.8Radiation protection in fabrication3.9Management of fabrication waste3.10Practice: comparative table of properties
4.1Uranium cycle in light water reactors4.2Plutonium recycling in mixed oxide fuel4.3Thorium cycle and the fissile isotope generated4.4Need for starter fissile material4.5Radiotoxicity of waste in each cycle4.6Decay heat and its effect on disposal4.7Complexity of reprocessing in each cycle4.8Secondary waste and its management4.9Industrial status of each cycle4.10Practice: compare waste inventories
5.1Relative costs of each option5.2Industrial infrastructure required5.3Accumulated operational experience5.4Proliferation resistance of each cycle5.5Safeguards and accountancy requirements5.6Physical protection of the material5.7National programmes and their motivation5.8Multi-criteria evaluation criteria5.9Realistic deployment horizon5.10Practice: multi-criteria analysis of the three options
6.1Choice of scenario and objectives6.2Definition of the options to compare6.3Comparative neutronic analysis6.4Materials and fabrication analysis6.5Material and waste balance6.6Economic analysis6.7Safeguards and acceptability analysis6.8Reasoned recommendation and its conditions6.9Study report6.10Defence of the project
How you'll learn
100 % online training on the SEIUM Institute campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: students progress at their own pace within the intake, which makes it possible to combine the programme with work.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is Serpent, OpenMC, SCALE (ORIGEN), Python (matplotlib), in free, academic or evaluation versions. Tests are studied using real cell calculation procedures for different fuels, comparison of actinide inventories, and analysis of cycle scenarios. Assessment is continuous, module by module, plus the final integrating project.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Characterise uranium, plutonium and thorium as fertile and fissile materials.
Compare their neutronic behaviour in different spectra.
Analyse their properties as fuel materials.
Evaluate complete fuel cycles and the waste they generate.
Assess the economic and safeguards implications.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- No prior qualification is required.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- Sufficient command of Spanish to follow technical regulatory reading.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 300 hours, spread over 3 to 5 months. That is an average of 10 to 15 hours a week, compatible with a full-time job.
The work uses Serpent, OpenMC, SCALE (ORIGEN), Python (matplotlib). Free, academic or evaluation versions are used, and the tutor indicates the free alternative where one exists.
SEIUM Institute's own diploma on passing the continuous assessment and the integrating project. It is in-house training, not an official qualification from the Ministry.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised in the advanced programme. Check the recognition policy when you enrol.
Related programmes
Course on Underwater Robotics in Nuclear Pools
Online course of 300 h in Underwater Robotics in Nuclear Pools. 6 modules covering IAEA SSG-15 (spent fuel storage), IEC 60529 (IP degrees of protection) and…
Nuclear Reprocessing Course: PUREX and Alternatives
300-hour online Course in nuclear reprocessing: PUREX and alternatives. 6 modules covering IAEA SSR-4 (Safety of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities), IAEA SSG-42 (Safety of Reprocessing Facilities)…
Course on Ethics of Robot-Collected Data
Online course of 300 h in Ethics of Robot-Collected Data. 6 modules covering Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (data protection, GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 (Data Act) and ROS…
More in Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
All Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships