Postgraduate DiplomaHealth, Biomechanics, Wearables & Operational Safety Applications open

Diploma in Usability Study Planning and IEC 62366 Protocols

Online postgraduate diploma of 800 hours in usability study planning and IEC 62366 protocols. 8 modules covering the usability engineering process, use specification, use-related risk analysis, user interface design, formative evaluation, summative (human factors validation) protocols, FDA human factors expectations and the usability engineering file, with an assigned technical tutor.

Duration6–8 months
ModeOnline
LanguageEnglish
Start datesSet by the faculty
AwardSEIUM Institute diploma

Diploma in Usability Study Planning and IEC 62366 Protocols — studying from the United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has a strong medical technology and healthcare engineering base, with research in biomechanics, medical devices and wearables across universities and companies in London, Oxford, Leeds and Glasgow. The NHS, medical device manufacturers and digital health firms require engineers who understand clinical requirements and regulatory compliance. Operational safety in workplaces, transport and sport drives work on human factors and ergonomics. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency regulates medical devices, and the Health and Safety Executive oversees workplace safety.

Fees for the United Kingdom: £746 (Pound sterling), with instalments and employer sponsorship available.

Relevant bodies in the United Kingdom

  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
  • Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM)
  • Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors (CIEHF)

Typical roles

  • Biomechanics Engineer
  • Medical Device Engineer
  • Wearables Engineer
  • Human Factors Engineer

Questions from the United Kingdom

Will this qualification be recognised by UK professional bodies such as the Institution of Engineering and Technology or the Institution of Mechanical Engineers?

SEIUM's qualifications are private qualifications, not official state degrees, and they are not accredited by any national body. Professional bodies such as the IET or IMechE decide whether to accept training for membership, usually through their own assessment of your experience and learning. Chartered Engineer status is awarded by the Engineering Council via licensed professional engineering institutions. Check directly with the relevant body before you enrol.

Will UK employers in healthcare technology, wearables or occupational safety value this training on a CV?

Employers decide for themselves how much weight to give a private qualification. Many value evidence of specialist skills, such as a completed final project and demonstrable work on biomechanics or wearable sensor systems, more than the name of the provider. Recognition is not guaranteed, so review relevant job adverts and ask prospective employers how they view online private training before committing.

Can I complete this programme alongside a full-time job in the UK, and does my employer need to fund it?

The programmes are 100% online and taught in English, so you can study at your own pace around work and across UK time zones. Master's programmes total 1,900 hours, postgraduate diplomas 800 hours and specialist courses 300 hours. Fees can be paid in instalments, and employer sponsorship is possible, though you should agree arrangements with your employer in advance.

Virtual lab · try it before you enrol

Take the controls.

Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.

SIM · LIVE ●
Learning outcomes

What you will be able to do

01

Apply the IEC 62366-1 usability engineering process to medical devices.

02

Define use specifications, user groups and use environments.

03

Identify critical tasks and analyse use-related risk with ISO 14971.

04

Plan and run formative evaluations to improve the user interface.

05

Write summative (human factors validation) protocols and reports.

06

Prepare usability documentation for MDR technical files and FDA submissions.

07

Lead the usability engineering programme of a medical device from start to finish.

Profile

Who it's for

  • Human factors and usability engineers working on medical devices.
  • Medical device R&D and design engineers responsible for user interfaces.
  • Quality and regulatory affairs professionals preparing usability engineering files.
  • UX researchers and designers moving into regulated healthcare products.
  • Risk management engineers who need to cover use errors under ISO 14971.
  • Clinical specialists and nurses involved in device evaluations.
  • Engineering, design or psychology graduates looking to move into the medical device sector.
Standards & tools

What you'll work with

  • IEC 62366-1 (application of usability engineering to medical devices)
  • IEC TR 62366-2 (guidance on usability engineering)
  • ISO 14971 (risk management for medical devices)
  • IEC 60601-1-6 (usability of medical electrical equipment)
  • FDA guidance: Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices (US human factors expectations)
  • ANSI/AAMI HE75 (human factors engineering design guidance)
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR), Annex I (general safety and performance requirements on use)
  • ISO 9241-11 and ISO 9241-210 (usability definitions and human-centred design)
  • ISO 20417 (information supplied by the manufacturer)
  • Figma
  • Morae or Lookback
  • Tobii Pro Lab
  • Microsoft Excel
  • Jira
Syllabus

8 modules

  1. 1.1Usability, use error and use-related risk
  2. 1.2Why use errors matter: incident and recall data
  3. 1.3Human-centred design principles (ISO 9241-210)
  4. 1.4Overview of the IEC 62366-1 process
  5. 1.5User interface: hardware, software, labelling and training
  6. 1.6Normal use, reasonably foreseeable misuse and abnormal use
  7. 1.7Regulatory expectations in the EU and the US
  8. 1.8Roles in a usability team
  9. 1.9Cost and timing of usability activities
  10. 1.10Exercise: usability gap analysis of a device
  1. 2.1Intended users, user profiles and user groups
  2. 2.2Use environments and conditions
  3. 2.3Operating principle and intended use
  4. 2.4Contextual inquiry and observational research
  5. 2.5Interviews and focus groups with clinicians and patients
  6. 2.6Task analysis and task hierarchies
  7. 2.7Known use problems from post-market data
  8. 2.8Accessibility and special populations
  9. 2.9Documenting the use specification
  10. 2.10Exercise: use specification
  1. 3.1Linking IEC 62366-1 and ISO 14971
  2. 3.2Identifying hazard-related use scenarios
  3. 3.3PCA analysis: perception, cognition and action
  4. 3.4Use FMEA and fault tree approaches
  5. 3.5Selecting critical tasks
  6. 3.6Risk control measures in the user interface
  7. 3.7Information for safety and labelling
  8. 3.8Evaluating residual use-related risk
  9. 3.9Traceability between tasks, hazards and controls
  10. 3.10Exercise: use-related risk analysis
  1. 4.1User interface specification structure
  2. 4.2Design guidance from ANSI/AAMI HE75
  3. 4.3Displays, alarms and controls
  4. 4.4Software user interfaces and workflows
  5. 4.5Instructions for use and quick reference guides
  6. 4.6Training as part of the user interface
  7. 4.7Packaging and connectors
  8. 4.8Design reviews and heuristic evaluation
  9. 4.9Managing user interface changes
  10. 4.10Exercise: user interface specification
  1. 5.1Purpose and timing of formative evaluations
  2. 5.2Choosing methods: expert review, cognitive walkthrough, usability tests
  3. 5.3Participant recruitment and sample sizes
  4. 5.4Prototypes and fidelity levels
  5. 5.5Test environment and simulated use
  6. 5.6Moderation techniques and think-aloud
  7. 5.7Data collection: observation, video and eye tracking
  8. 5.8Analysis of use difficulties and root causes
  9. 5.9Iterating the design from formative findings
  10. 5.10Exercise: formative study plan
  1. 6.1Summative evaluation (human factors validation) objectives
  2. 6.2Protocol structure and content
  3. 6.3Critical tasks and acceptance criteria
  4. 6.4Participant groups and representative users
  5. 6.5Test scenarios and realistic use conditions
  6. 6.6Training decay and test sequencing
  7. 6.7Data collection and root cause interviews
  8. 6.8Analysis of use errors, close calls and difficulties
  9. 6.9Summative report and residual risk conclusion
  10. 6.10Exercise: summative test protocol
  1. 7.1FDA human factors guidance and submission content
  2. 7.2Human factors engineering report structure
  3. 7.3Critical task identification for FDA
  4. 7.4Combination products and home-use devices
  5. 7.5MDR Annex I and technical documentation
  6. 7.6Usability engineering file contents
  7. 7.7Post-market usability: complaints and field data
  8. 7.8Usability of software and connected devices
  9. 7.9Notified body and FDA review questions
  10. 7.10Exercise: human factors report outline
  1. 8.1Compiling the usability engineering file
  2. 8.2Traceability from use specification to validation
  3. 8.3Managing changes after validation
  4. 8.4Usability in design change assessments
  5. 8.5Lessons learned and continuous improvement
  6. 8.6Planning the integrative case and deliverables
  7. 8.7Developing the case with tutor guidance
  8. 8.8Verification of results and critical analysis
  9. 8.9Technical defence and peer review
  10. 8.10Final project: usability study plan and protocols for a medical device
Methodology, software & labs

How you'll learn

100% online training on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within each intake, so it is compatible with full-time work.

Each module combines theory, guided reading of the reference standards and applied exercises. The working software is Figma, Morae or Lookback, Tobii Pro Lab, Microsoft Excel and Jira, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Practice is based on real usability documentation: use specifications, task analyses, use-related risk analyses, formative study reports and summative test protocols. Assessment is continuous by module, plus the final integrative project.

Standards covered: IEC 62366-1, IEC TR 62366-2, ISO 14971, IEC 60601-1-6, FDA guidance: Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, ANSI/AAMI HE75, Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR), Annex I, ISO 9241-11 and ISO 9241-210, ISO 20417.

Assigned technical tutor:every module ends with a deliverable that your tutor marks individually.
Standards-based learning:guided reading of IEC 62366-1, ISO 14971 and FDA human factors guidance applied to real cases, not as a theoretical annex.
Industry software:Figma, Morae or Lookback, Tobii Pro Lab, Microsoft Excel and Jira, in free, academic or evaluation versions.
Final project:an integrative usability study plan with formative and summative protocols for a medical device, reviewed by your tutor.
Flexible format:100% online, no fixed timetables, compatible with full-time work.
Capstone project

Build it end to end

Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.

Use specification
Define users, use environments and tasks for a real medical device.
Use-related risk analysis
Identify hazard-related use scenarios and critical tasks.
Formative study
Plan a formative evaluation and analyse its findings.
Summative protocol
Write a summative test protocol aligned with IEC 62366-1 and FDA guidance.
Final project
Compile the usability engineering file for the device, reviewed by your tutor.
Career opportunities

Where this takes you

Human factors engineer (medical devices)Usability study managerMedical device UX researcherRegulatory specialist for usability filesRisk management engineerMedical device design engineer
Admissions & scholarships

Requirements

  • Prior technical training or professional experience in the sector. No university degree is required.
  • An internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme software.
  • English sufficient to read technical standards.

Ready to start?

Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The programme totals 800 hours over 6–8 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.

You work with Figma, Morae or Lookback, Tobii Pro Lab, Microsoft Excel and Jira, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.

A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the final project. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.

Yes. Modules passed are recognised in a higher programme in the same area (postgraduate diploma or master's). Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.

Prior technical training or professional experience in the sector (no university degree is required), a computer able to run the programme software and English sufficient to read technical standards.

Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.

Diploma in Usability Study Planning and IEC 62366 ProtocolsEnrol
Scroll to Top
SEIUM – Institute of Advanced Engineering
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.