Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication Course
Online 300-hour course in ethics of radiological risk communication. 6 modules covering ICRP Publication 138 (ethical foundations of radiation protection), IAEA GSR Part 7 (emergency preparedness and response) and NVivo. Assigned tutor and open enrolment.
Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication Course — studying from India
India's nuclear programme is state-led and centred on the Department of Atomic Energy, with operations managed by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India and research carried out at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Reactor sites are located at places such as Tarapur, Kakrapar, Kudankulam and Rawatbhata. Regulation is handled by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, which sets safety standards for reactors and fuel facilities. Engineers in this field work on reactor systems, fuel cycle technologies, radiation safety and materials, with expertise supported by institutions such as the Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research.
Fees for India: ₹57,900 (Indian Rupee), with instalments and employer sponsorship available.
Relevant bodies in India
Typical roles
Questions from India
Who regulates nuclear engineering work in India and does this course satisfy them?
The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) regulates nuclear safety in India, and the Department of Atomic Energy runs the sector. SEIUM's qualification is private, not an official degree, and is not accredited by any national body. It does not satisfy any regulatory requirement, and AERB or the employer will decide what qualifications they require.
Which Indian employers work in nuclear engineering and the fuel cycle?
Public sector nuclear organisations and their associated industries are the main employers, and entry normally follows government recruitment and vetting processes. Private employers in the sector also exist. Because hiring is tightly controlled, a private online qualification is unlikely to be the deciding factor, and recognition depends on the employer.
Is this programme workable with a job in India, and how is it funded?
The programme is online and taught in English, so you can study from home across India without a student visa. Each student is assigned a technical tutor and completes a final project. Fees are payable in instalments, and employer sponsorship is possible, which is often the practical route for working engineers.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Explain the particularities of radiological risk perception.
Apply the ethical values of the ICRP to communication.
Select appropriate audiences and channels.
Design messages for critical situations and emergencies.
Foster public participation and trust.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the communication carried out.
Develop a radiological risk communication plan.
Who it's for
- Radiological risk communication officer seeking to specialise in Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication.
- Radiation protection expert seeking to specialise in Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication.
- Public information officer seeking to specialise in Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication.
- Citizen participation specialist seeking to specialise in Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication.
- Emergency spokesperson seeking to specialise in Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication.
- Communication ethics consultant seeking to specialise in Ethics in Radiological Risk Communication.
- Engineering or science graduates seeking to join regulatory bodies.
What you'll work with
- ICRP Publication 138 (ethical foundations of radiation protection)
- IAEA GSR Part 7 (emergency preparedness and response)
- ICRP Publication 146 (radiation protection after nuclear accidents)
- Aarhus Convention (access to information and public participation)
- Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards)
- Real Decreto 1029/2022 (protection of health against ionising radiation)
6 modules · 300 h
1.1Why radiation generates a particular social response1.2Real risk, perceived risk and the factors that amplify it1.3Trust in the institution as a central variable1.4Radiological literacy of the public1.5Technical vocabulary versus comprehensible language1.6Units, figures and honest comparisons1.7The duty to inform and the right to know1.8Communication as part of the protection system1.9Cases where communication worsened the harm1.10Exercise: rewriting a technical statement
2.1Principles of autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence2.2Distributive justice in exposure to risk2.3Informed consent in the medical field2.4Veracity and the limits of paternalism2.5Transparency versus data protection2.6Conflict between public interest and the interest of the individual2.7Scientific uncertainty and honesty about what is not known2.8Intergenerational equity in waste and legacy2.9Professional codes of conduct2.10Debate: how far to inform about an uncertainty
3.1Patients and families in the clinical context3.2Exposed workers and their representatives3.3Population surrounding a facility3.4Local authorities and emergency services3.5Media and specialist journalists3.6Social media, rumour and disinformation3.7Vulnerable groups and language barriers3.8Schoolchildren and educational outreach3.9Choosing the channel according to the objective3.10Practice: adapting the same message for three audiences
4.1Phases of a radiological crisis4.2Prior preparation and pre-drafted messages4.3First announcement: minimum content and timelines4.4Single spokesperson and coordination between bodies4.5What to do when data are incomplete4.6Correcting a public error4.7Managing media pressure4.8Protective recommendations that are understandable and actionable4.9Communication in the recovery phase4.10Practice: press conference simulation
5.1From informing to dialogue: levels of participation5.2Local information committees5.3Participatory radiological monitoring5.4Deliberation on controversial decisions5.5Managing legitimate disagreement5.6Evaluating the effectiveness of communication5.7Indicators of trust and comprehension5.8Communication training for technical staff5.9Documentation and accountability5.10Practice: designing a participatory process
6.1Choosing the context and the organisation6.2Map of audiences and their concerns6.3Ethical analysis of the dilemmas present6.4Key messages and supporting materials6.5Routine communication plan6.6Crisis communication plan6.7Proposed participation process6.8Evaluation indicators6.9Plan report6.10Defence of the project
How you'll learn
100 % online training on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. No fixed timetable: students progress at their own pace within the intake, which makes it possible to combine the programme with work.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is NVivo, Qualtrics, Canva, Advanced Excel, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Case work draws on real communication analysis procedures from Chernobyl and Fukushima, message design for different audiences, and evaluation of information campaigns. Assessment is continuous, module by module, plus the final integrative project.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Explain the particularities of radiological risk perception.
Apply the ethical values of the ICRP to communication.
Select appropriate audiences and channels.
Design messages for critical situations and emergencies.
Foster public participation and trust.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- No previous qualification required.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- Sufficient Spanish to follow technical regulatory texts.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme comprises 300 hours in total, spread over 3 to 5 months. That is between 10 and 15 hours per week on average, compatible with full-time work.
You work with NVivo, Qualtrics, Canva and Advanced Excel. Free, academic or evaluation versions are used, and the tutor indicates the free alternative where one exists.
A SEIUM own diploma upon passing the continuous assessment and the integrative project. It is in-house training, not an official qualification from the Ministry.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised towards the advanced programme. Check the credit transfer policy when you enrol.
Related programmes
Nuclear Fusion Principles Course
Online 300 h course in nuclear fusion principles. 6 modules covering ISO 80000-10 (atomic and nuclear physics quantities), ASME BPVC Section III, Division 4 (fusion energy…
Course in Nuclear Facility Decommissioning
Online 300-hour course in nuclear facility decommissioning. 6 modules covering IAEA GSR Part 6 (decommissioning of facilities), Directive 2011/70/Euratom (spent fuel and radioactive waste management) and…
Course on Exoskeleton Design for Nuclear Maintenance
Online course of 300 h in Exoskeleton Design for Nuclear Maintenance. 6 modules covering ISO 13482 (personal care robots), Directive 2006/42/EC (machinery) and OpenSim. Dedicated tutor…
More in Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
All Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships