Postgraduate DiplomaHealth, Biomechanics, Wearables & Operational Safety Applications open

Postgraduate Diploma in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity

Online 800 h Postgraduate Diploma in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity. 8 modules covering Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act), Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (medical devices) and Python (Fairlearn). Assigned tutor and open enrolment.

Duration800 h
ModeOnline
LanguageEnglish
Start datesSet by the faculty
AwardSEIUM Institute diploma

Postgraduate Diploma in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity — studying from Australia

Health technology and biomechanics are growing areas in Australia, supported by a strong medical research sector and an established medical device industry. Wearable devices and occupational safety systems are increasingly used in mining, construction and healthcare. Medical devices are regulated nationally, requiring engineers to understand conformity, risk management and clinical evaluation. Employers include medical device manufacturers, hospitals, research institutes such as those affiliated with universities, and workplace safety consultancies.

Fees for Australia: A$2,050 (AUD), with instalments and employer sponsorship available.

Relevant bodies in Australia

  • Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
  • Safe Work Australia
  • Standards Australia
  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW)

Typical roles

  • Biomechanical Engineer
  • Medical Device Engineer
  • Wearables Engineer
  • Occupational Safety Engineer

Questions from Australia

Will a SEIUM qualification be recognised by Engineers Australia or other professional bodies for this area?

SEIUM qualifications are private qualifications and are not accredited by Engineers Australia or any other national body. Recognition is decided by individual employers and, where relevant, by the professional body assessing your application. Engineers Australia assesses skills and experience independently, so check directly with the body you hope to join before enrolling.

Which Australian employers might value this training in health, biomechanics or wearable safety work?

Employers in Australian medical device firms, rehabilitation services, workplace health and safety teams and wearable technology companies may consider advanced engineering training when hiring. Whether they value a private qualification depends on each employer's own policy and on your existing experience. Speaking with prospective employers about how they view private qualifications is a sensible step.

Can I study this alongside full-time work in Australia, and is employer funding possible?

The programmes are 100% online and taught in English, so you can study from any time zone, including Australian time zones, around your work hours. Fees are payable in instalments, and employer sponsorship is possible; ask your employer whether they fund training. Plan for the workload of 300 to 1,900 hours depending on the programme, and confirm the schedule with SEIUM.

Virtual lab · try it before you enrol

Take the controls.

Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.

SIM · LIVE ●
Learning outcomes

What you will be able to do

01

Describe the uses of algorithms in clinical practice and their risks for equity.

02

Apply equity metrics such as demographic parity, equal opportunity and group calibration.

03

Detect biases originating in data, labels and model design.

04

Apply bias mitigation techniques before, during and after training.

05

Generate explanations understandable to professionals and patients.

06

Interpret the obligations of the AI Act and the MDR for high-risk healthcare systems.

07

Carry out a complete algorithmic audit of a clinical model.

Profile

Who it's for

  • Healthcare algorithm auditor who wants to specialise in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity.
  • Clinical data scientist who wants to specialise in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity.
  • Head of AI governance in healthcare who wants to specialise in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity.
  • Regulatory affairs specialist in healthcare software who wants to specialise in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity.
  • Health equity researcher who wants to specialise in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity.
  • AI ethics consultant who wants to specialise in Algorithmic Transparency and Health Equity.
  • Graduates in engineering or science seeking to enter public and private healthcare.
Standards & tools

What you'll work with

  • Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act)
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (medical devices)
  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)
  • ISO/IEC TR 24027 (bias in AI systems)
  • ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management systems)
  • ISO/IEC 23894 (AI risk management)
  • WHO guidance on ethics and governance of AI for health (2021)
Syllabus

8 modules · 800 h

  1. 1.1Rules, scores and clinical machine learning
  2. 1.2Lifecycle of a healthcare model
  3. 1.3From the Framingham score to deep learning
  4. 1.4Sources of bias in clinical data
  5. 1.5Social determinants of health
  6. 1.6Cost versus need bias (Obermeyer, 2019)
  7. 1.7Race-based equations: eGFR and spirometry
  8. 1.8Stakeholders: developers, hospitals and patients
  9. 1.9WHO principles on AI in health
  10. 1.10Case study: initial audit of a triage score
  1. 2.1Demographic parity and its limits
  2. 2.2Equal opportunity and equalised odds
  3. 2.3Calibration by subgroup
  4. 2.4Kleinberg and Chouldechova impossibility theorems
  5. 2.5Individual versus group fairness
  6. 2.6Intersectionality and small subgroups
  7. 2.7Confidence intervals by group
  8. 2.8Choosing metrics according to the clinical context
  9. 2.9Fairlearn and AIF360 tools
  10. 2.10Practice: calculating metrics with Fairlearn
  1. 3.1Under-representation in cohorts and trials
  2. 3.2Pulse oximetry and skin tone
  3. 3.3Proxy labels in care data
  4. 3.4Missing data linked to healthcare access
  5. 3.5Data drift between hospitals
  6. 3.6Dermatological imaging and the Fitzpatrick scale
  7. 3.7Datasheets for Datasets
  8. 3.8Collection and protection of sensitive variables
  9. 3.9Stratified exploratory analysis
  10. 3.10Laboratory: detecting label bias
  1. 4.1Reweighting and resampling
  2. 4.2Training with fairness constraints
  3. 4.3Post-processing and group-specific thresholds
  4. 4.4Debate on the explicit use of race
  5. 4.5Multicentre federated learning
  6. 4.6Synthetic data and its risks
  7. 4.7Cost in overall performance
  8. 4.8External validation in diverse populations
  9. 4.9Bias in clinical language models
  10. 4.10Practice: comparing mitigation techniques
  1. 5.1Transparency, explainability and interpretability
  2. 5.2Interpretable models: GAMs and scorecards
  3. 5.3SHAP, LIME and their limitations
  4. 5.4Saliency maps in medical imaging
  5. 5.5Counterfactual explanations for clinicians
  6. 5.6Model Cards and model sheets
  7. 5.7TRIPOD+AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines
  8. 5.8Communicating uncertainty
  9. 5.9Explanations for patients
  10. 5.10Workshop: drafting a clinical Model Card
  1. 6.1Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and high-risk systems
  2. 6.2Interaction with MDR 2017/745
  3. 6.3Data governance under Article 10
  4. 6.4Article 22 GDPR and automated decisions
  5. 6.5Sensitive data for bias correction
  6. 6.6FDA GMLP principles and PCCP
  7. 6.7European Health Data Space
  8. 6.8Law 15/2022 on equal treatment
  9. 6.9Liability and claims
  10. 6.10Case study: analysis of a prioritisation algorithm
  1. 7.1AI committees and clinical ethics
  2. 7.2Algorithmic impact assessment
  3. 7.3Patient and community participation
  4. 7.4Fairness monitoring in production
  5. 7.5Subgroup drift and alerts
  6. 7.6Internal and external audits
  7. 7.7Public registers of algorithms
  8. 7.8Withdrawal and correction procedures
  9. 7.9Fairness indicators in dashboards
  10. 7.10Workshop: post-deployment monitoring plan
  1. 8.1Algorithm selection and clinical context
  2. 8.2Map of stakeholders and affected groups
  3. 8.3Analysis of data and labels
  4. 8.4Evaluation of fairness metrics
  5. 8.5Mitigation proposal
  6. 8.6Transparency documentation
  7. 8.7Governance and monitoring plan
  8. 8.8Conclusions and recommendations
  9. 8.9Report and presentation
  10. 8.10Final review with the tutor
Methodology, software & labs

How you'll learn

Training is 100 % online on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: students progress at their own pace within the intake, which makes it possible to combine the programme with work.

Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is Python (Fairlearn), AI Fairness 360, SHAP, What-If Tool, R, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Exercises are based on real equity audit procedures applied to clinical models, bias analysis by patient subgroup, preparation of model sheets and transparency documentation. Assessment is continuous, module by module, plus a final integrative project.

Accreditable laboratories(EN ISO/IEC 17025) with rotor test rig, EMC/lightning pre-compliance, HIL/SIL, vibration/acoustics.
Evidence-driven Master's Thesis:safety case, test plan, compliance dossier and operational limits.
Industry-led mentoring:lecturers with experience in training, , eVTOL/UAM and flight test.
Flexible format(hybrid/online), international cohorts and support from SEIUM Career Services.
Ethics and safety:safety-by-design approach, OT cyber-security, DIH and compliance as pillars.
Capstone project

Build it end to end

Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.

Algorithm selection and clinical context

Describe the uses of algorithms in clinical practice and their risks for equity.

Map of stakeholders and affected groups

Apply equity metrics such as demographic parity, equal opportunity and group calibration.

Analysis of data and labels

Detect biases originating in data, labels and model design.

Evaluation of fairness metrics

Apply bias mitigation techniques before, during and after training.

Mitigation proposal

Generate explanations understandable to professionals and patients.

Career opportunities

Where this takes you

Healthcare algorithm auditorClinical data scientistHead of AI governance in healthcareRegulatory affairs specialist in healthcare softwareHealth equity researcherAI ethics consultant
Admissions & scholarships

Requirements

  • Prior technical training or professional experience in the sector. A university degree is not required.
  • Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
  • Sufficient level of Spanish to follow technical regulatory texts.

Ready to start?

Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The programme comprises 800 hours in total, spread over 6 to 8 months. That is an average of 10 to 15 hours per week, compatible with full-time work.

Students work with Python (Fairlearn), AI Fairness 360, SHAP, What-If Tool, R. Free, academic or evaluation versions are used, and the tutor indicates the free alternative where one exists.

An own SEIUM diploma awarded upon passing continuous assessment and the integrative project. It is in-house training, not an official Ministry qualification.

Yes. Modules passed in a course or diploma in the same area are recognised in the higher programme. Check the recognition policy when you enrol.

Postgraduate Diploma in Algorithmic Transparency and Health EquityEnrol
Scroll to Top
SEIUM – Institute of Advanced Engineering
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.